Bokator World: News
bokatorworld
Monks
Home
5

Contact

  • Monks
  • Tholun23@gmail.com
  • +855015897766

Loading...

Loading...
Showing posts with label News. Show all posts
Showing posts with label News. Show all posts

March 22, 2026 - #Editorial (Khmer and English)

The Impact of Waste on Public Health


Waste is an inevitable part of daily life, yet improper management serves as a critical threat to both human health and the environment. When waste is not collected, recycled, or disposed of according to technical standards, it poses severe risks to communities in the following ways:


1. Air Pollution

The open burning of waste—particularly plastics, rubber, or textiles—releases toxic chemicals into the atmosphere. Inhaling this contaminated air causes immediate health issues such as coughing, asthma, eye irritation, and headaches, while long-term exposure can lead to chronic respiratory diseases and other life-threatening conditions.


2. Contamination of Water Sources

Waste discarded in open fields or near water bodies can be washed by rainwater into rivers, streams, wells, and groundwater. The consumption of this contaminated water is a primary source of gastrointestinal infections, such as diarrhea, cholera, and various intestinal diseases, which impact children most severely.


3. Spread of Disease Vectors

Waste piles in public spaces provide ideal breeding grounds for insects and rodents, such as flies, mosquitoes, and rats. These animals act as vectors for numerous dangerous diseases, including dengue fever, chikungunya, and other infections that compromise community health stability.


4. Degradation of Environment and Quality of Life

Beyond physical illness, poorly managed waste creates foul odors and causes soil degradation. It does not only destroy the aesthetic value of an area but also turns living environments into unsanitary and unsafe spaces for both physical and mental well-being.


Conclusion

To protect public health, we must implement waste reduction, waste segregation for recycling, and ensure an efficient waste collection system. Collaboration between the government, the private sector, and citizens is the cornerstone of the solution to building a clean environment and improving the quality of life for everyone.

0 comment

 One day, one Cambodian traditional game until Khmer New Year, so you can learn how to play them!

Day four: Jarb Kon Khlaeng


What’s Jarb Kon Khlaeng?


Jarb Kon Khlaeng or catching the chicks  Game is a  game that teenagers often play during the New Year. The game is not only for the New Year, but can also be played in free time from work or class. Playing this game can teach people to be careful in protecting themselves and their families.


How to Play Jarb Kon Khlaeng? 


When playing the game of catching kites, they usually assign a large person to be the leader of the flock, called the “Hen​​ (Meh Moan)”, and assign several people to be the chicks. Then they choose another person to be the “Khlaeng (Barn Owl)”, waiting to catch the chicks.


Before playing, they all make a small fire. The one who is the hen must order her chicks to hold each other’s waists, standing in a row and walking. At the same time, the hen says a mocking word to the Barn Owl:


“ចាប់កូនខ្លែង (the barn owl catches the chicks), ប្រលែងកូនអក (let go of the baby hawk eagles), ពពេចញ៉ែកញ៉ក (sounding of Oriental White-eye), កូនអញតែមួយ (my only chick), ជីអន្លុងដាំត្រកួន (Dig a hole and plant the morning glory), ទន្សាយរត់ពួន (the rabbits run and hide), ត្រកួនឡើងលាស់ (the morning glory grows) ទៀន១គូតាំងយូបាំងព្រះ (Light a pair of candles, the umbrella shading the god), លើកដៃសំពះ ដូនៗសុំភ្លើង (raise your hands in greeting, and ask grandma for light).


While the one who is the Barn owl stands and pretends to be innocent. When he hears the hen and chicks screaming, the barn owl walks towards the fire and asks for light, saying, “ask grandma for light!”. Then the hen replied “the fire is gone”. The barn owl continued, “Please give me a piece.”


Once heard, the hen said, “Give the one who is the most stubborn,” the barn owl started chasing and catching the one who was behind her. The hen tried to protect her chicks from the barn owl, and the chicks tried to cling to each other tightly, running up and down, afraid that the barn owl would catch each one of them. Sometimes the barn owl catches the chicks one by one until they are all gone, but sometimes it only catches one.


The way of playing the game of catching the chicks shows the essence of awakening everyone to have various strategies and methods to protect themselves and their family members and relatives in the event of an emergency or disaster.

.

📍 Coming to Cambodia! Book for airport transfer in advance with special offer.


🎁 Visit: www.taptaxi .asia


Enjoy special airport transfer with special price, cash back and more promotion.


Reference:


Sakada, & Sakada. (2026, January 5). Jarb Kon Khlaeng or catching the chicks Game - IntoCambodia.org. IntoCambodia.org - Culture, Temples, Food, History.. 


0 comment

Cambodia has lodged another formal protest against the continued encroachment by Thai armed forces into Cambodian territory, including land clearing, road construction, and the building of permanent structures. In some cases, Buddha statues have been erected and Thai national flags raised, following the December ceasefire, at the following locations:

- Preah Vihear Province: Mom Bei area around Hill 469; An Seh area; around the An Seh International Border Checkpoint; O’Phka Sneh; Hills 677 and 500; Ta Thav area; around Daun Ton Temple; Hills 505 and 333; Ta Sem and Chak Chreng areas; and Phnom Trop area.

- Oddar Meanchey Province: the southeastern area of Tamone Thom Temple; the western part of the Domnak Sdach area; O'Smach area; and Khnar Temple.


Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation


0 comment

Khmer Sbai Evidence in Longvek Period Bas-reliefs at Angkor Wat

By Architect Posuthea | Ancient Art Content

The "Sbai" is a vital element of ancient Khmer women's attire, used to cover the upper body. There are various types and designs of Khmer Sbai, each utilized differently based on occasion, social hierarchy, and gender, all deeply rooted in the sophisticated traditions of ancient Khmer civilization. Interestingly, the "Sbai" was also notably worn by Khmer men on certain occasions, following specific and unique traditional rules.

On this occasion, we would like to highlight significant sculptural evidence depicting the "Use of Sbai by Khmer women during the Longvek Period," carved onto the walls of Angkor Wat.

Why are there Longvek-era carvings on the walls of the Angkor-era Angkor Wat?

According to two inscriptions found alongside two long panels—where both the carving technique and artistic style differ significantly from other panels in Angkor Wat—it is revealed that between 1546 and 1564: "His Majesty Preah Bat Samdech Borom Reacheathirat Ramathipadei Borom Chakrapattireach (King Ang Chan I, the founder of Longvek) ordered his officials to lead royal artisans to complete the carving of two panels in the corner gallery (Northeast gallery), which had remained unfinished since the reign of King Mahavisnuloka (King Suryavarman II, the founder of Angkor Wat)." Full details can be read in the book Inscriptions of Middle Period Cambodia.

This means: "Two galleries of Angkor Wat were originally left blank without carvings until the reign of King Ang Chan I. As a monarch who deeply valued ancestral heritage, he commissioned the royal artistic department to complete the carvings." This further informs us that: "Even after 400 years (from the 12th to the 16th century), Khmer kings never forgot the names and achievements of their glorious Angkorian ancestors."

These bas-reliefs show "women of the Khmer royal court dressed in: Sampot Samloy, wearing the Sbai across the shoulder, adorned with bracelets, anklets, necklaces, earrings, hairpins, and a unique bun hairstyle. In their hands, they hold ceremonial objects according to their roles, such as: betel nut trays (Phan Preah Srei), spittoons, and fans, etc." These depictions bear a striking resemblance to photographs of Khmer court ladies during the reign of King Sisowath Monivong.

>>> Knowing ourselves clearly makes us the best successors.

#Art #BasRelief #Sbai #KhmerSbai #Longvek #AngkorWat

#Cambodia #Khmer

0 comment

 Cambodia Unveils Restored Giant ‘Dancing Shiva’ Statue from Koh Ker


SIEM REAP, March 19, 2026 — Cambodia has unveiled a restored colossal “Dancing Shiva” statue from the ancient Koh Ker temple complex, marking a major milestone in the preservation of the country’s cultural heritage.


The unveiling took place at the Angkor Conservation Depot in Siem Reap before an invited audience, following more than five years of meticulous restoration work.


The statue, dating back to the first half of the 10th century, was originally commissioned during the reign of King Jayavarman IV and once stood in the royal sanctuary of Prasat Thom at Koh Ker, now a UNESCO World Heritage site.


Standing about five metres tall, with five heads and ten arms, and weighing approximately seven tonnes, the sandstone sculpture had been shattered into thousands of fragments before conservation efforts began.


The restoration project, initiated after fragments were gathered in 2012, involved painstaking efforts by a team of Cambodian and international experts to reassemble the statue piece by piece, using advanced conservation techniques.


Officials said the successful reconstruction highlights Cambodia’s growing capacity in heritage conservation and archaeological restoration, supported by international collaboration.


Experts involved in the project described the work as one of the most complex restoration efforts undertaken on a Khmer sculpture of this scale.


Authorities expressed hope that the restored statue will eventually be returned to its original location at Koh Ker, allowing public display at the historic site.


The project underscores Cambodia’s broader efforts to preserve and promote its rich cultural legacy, which plays a key role in tourism and national identity.

0 comment

 The Phnom Bakheng Temple, constructed in the late 9th century CE under Yasovarman I, rises atop a natural hill at the centre of Angkor as one of the earliest temple-mountains of the Khmer world, built from sandstone and laterite with precisely arranged terraces aligned to the cardinal directions, forming a five-tiered pyramid that symbolically represents Mount Meru, the cosmic axis in Hindu cosmology; serving as the state temple of Yasodharapura and dedicated to Shiva through a central lingam expressing royal association with the divine, the structure originally supported numerous small towers in a carefully ordered layout, reflecting cosmological intent, while its elevated position and monumental design established a lasting architectural and ideological model for subsequent Angkorian temples...

0 comment

Rising in tiers of warm reddish brick and laterite within the Angkor region of Siem Reap, Pre Rup is a 10th-century temple-mountain built in 961 CE by the Khmer king Rajendravarman II, designed as a state temple dedicated primarily to Shiva, with a stepped pyramid rising above a series of concentric enclosures and crowned by five sanctuary towers arranged in a quincunx pattern symbolising the sacred peaks of Mount Meru, reflecting the classic cosmological layout of Khmer temple architecture...

0 comment

Samdech Thipadei Hun Manet Calls for Continued Attention to Displaced Persons.
AKP Phnom Penh, March 13, 2026 --

Prime Minister Samdech Moha Borvor Thipadei Hun Manet has instructed relevant ministries, institutions, and local authorities to continue paying close attention to displaced persons, including those who have returned to their homes and those who have not yet been able to do so.

During the Cabinet’s plenary meeting held on Mar. 13 at the Peace Palace in Phnom Penh, Samdech Thipadei emphasised the need to address both the livelihoods and essential infrastructure requirements of the affected people.

He reiterated that the provision of temporary shelters for displaced persons who have not yet been able to return home is intended to ensure their well-being, environmental conditions, and overall welfare.

At the same time, he stressed that such measures do not mean the Royal Government is relinquishing its claim over the territory. The government remains firm and resolute in safeguarding Cambodia’s territorial integrity and continues to address the matter through peaceful diplomatic mechanisms.

As of the morning of Mar. 13, approximately 610,000 people, equivalent to about 94 percent of the total of over 640,000 displaced persons, have returned to their homes. The rest, 37,076, including 19,245 women and 12,795 children, remain at safety camps

0 comment

Ancient Shiva Nataraja Statue Restored to Full Form After More Than Five Years.
AKP Siem Reap, March 19, 2026 —
The monumental Shiva Nataraja (Dancing Shiva) statue, a masterpiece of the Koh Ker style, has been successfully restored to its full form after more than five years of meticulous conservation work, and was officially unveiled at the Angkor Conservation in Siem Reap on the evening of Mar. 18, 2026.
The unveiling ceremony was presided over by H.E. Dr. Phoeurng Sackona, Minister of Culture and Fine Arts, and opened to the public for viewing and study of this remarkable cultural heritage.
Originating from Prasat Krahom in the Koh Ker temple complex, the statue dates back to the 10th century and is considered the largest Shiva Nataraja statue in Cambodia and across Southeast Asia. Standing five meters tall, the statue features five faces and ten arms, reflecting the richness and sophistication of ancient Khmer artistry.
The statue had been fragmented into more than 10,000 pieces during the civil war due to destruction and looting. Efforts to restore it began in 2012, with the collection and cataloguing of fragments. Over the past five years, experts have carefully reassembled the pieces under strict technical and conservation standards to ensure both authenticity and long-term stability.
The restoration project was carried out through cooperation between the National Authority for Preah Vihear and the École française d’Extrême-Orient (EFEO), with support from the APSARA National Authority, Angkor Conservation, and financial assistance from the ALIPH Foundation.
Speaking at the event, H.E. Dr. Phoeurng Sackona praised the dedication of the experts involved, noting that the restoration represents not only the revival of a priceless artifact, but also a reconnection of Cambodia’s glorious past with the present.
According to the Ministry, the statue is planned to be relocated to its original site at Koh Ker, where it will serve both as a sacred object of worship and as a key attraction to draw more visitors to the UNESCO World Heritage site.

 

0 comment

 Scenes from the wedding day of the Prime Minister of Cambodia and the former Prime Minister of Thailand


This shows the practice of traditions and customs of using wedding clothes according to the style of each country. Please do not argue with Cambodia, no matter how you argue, you will not win Cambodia because Cambodia is a country with noble historical roots since before you were born.

0 comment

Press Release of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation

0 comment

 From Andy Brouwer :


Preah Vihear: 

An Ancient Temple at the Heart of a Modern Conflict. 


March 13, 2026. Article by Sui-Lee Wee, the Southeast Asia bureau chief for The New York Times - Visuals by Lauren DeCicca.


A rare visit to a Khmer temple on Thailand and Cambodia’s border showed how deadly clashes between the two countries have scarred a heritage site. Sui-Lee Wee was among the first few reporters allowed to travel to the disputed site last month.

The sandstone walls are more than a millennium old but they are pockmarked with holes from artillery fire. An ornate column has collapsed. A carving of a mythical seven-headed serpent has been destroyed. All along the half-mile causeway are triangular red placards that warn of unexploded ordnance.

This monument, the Preah Vihear temple in Cambodia, was largely unscathed for centuries because it’s so remote. Conceptualized as a “stairway to heaven,” this series of stone pavilions and hallways sits on a sheer cliff in the Dangrek Mountains along the Cambodia-Thailand border.

But since colonial times, the temple — a masterpiece of Khmer architecture that was built as a shrine to the Hindu god Shiva and evolved into a Buddhist sanctuary — has been a flashpoint for tension and conflict. A few decades ago the area was a stronghold of the Khmer Rouge, and littered with land mines.

Today, it is an emblem of two warring neighbors, Cambodia and Thailand, that cannot agree on where their border sits. The International Court of Justice has affirmed that the temple belongs to Cambodia. But tensions spilled over last year into two devastating rounds of clashes that left dozens dead and hundreds of thousands displaced on both sides of the border.

During the fighting, Cambodia says Thailand attacked the temple, which is a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Thailand says it was targeting Cambodian military installations inside the temple. To support their claim, Thai officials provided images of bunkers, artillery and command posts that they said were within the temple complex. But a New York Times analysis was not able to verify those locations independently. Cambodia denies Thailand’s claim.

The fighting left deep scars at the site, which is older than the more famous Angkor Wat in nearby Siem Reap. Years of work by the United States to restore an ancient staircase have been erased. Efforts by China and India to help with other repairs have stalled.

The temple’s Cambodian custodians fear that the damage is irreparable. “If it’s destroyed, it’s lost,” said Mao Chanthou, 21, a temple “preservation agent” whose job was to prevent tourists from vandalizing the site. “Even if it’s rebuilt, it won’t be the same as the original.”

Cambodia accused Thailand of targeting the temple. Thailand says it was attacking Cambodian military positions.

The temple remains closed to the public. But last month, after the Cambodian authorities swept the area for unexploded ordnance, they allowed a small group of journalists, including from The New York Times, to visit. Two government officers met us in Siem Reap and we drove north for about four hours by car, and then traveled in a pickup truck for 45 minutes to ascend the 1,700-foot cliff.

Blanketing the 150-hectare complex was a sea of cordoned-off zones with remnants of bombs and artillery shells. It was a stark scene of how nationalism could threaten centuries of shared history.

A millennium ago, this mountainous jungle was a thriving center of the Khmer civilization, then one of the world’s most advanced and artistic empires, which extended across a vast swath of Southeast Asia.

The Preah Vihear temple, known as Phra Viharn in Thailand, dates back to the ninth century. Both names are translated as “sacred monastery” or “abode of gods.”

The border dispute comes down to the different maps used by Thailand and Cambodia. Thailand contends that the 500-mile border between the nations should follow the natural watershed line, while Cambodia insists on following a map drawn up by colonial France.

For historians, Preah Vihear offers a living record of the evolution of the Khmer Empire. Because it was built over the course of 300 years by multiple kings, it provides insight into Khmer religion, art and engineering. Some visitors consider its setting more spectacular than Angkor Wat.

The Preah Vihear temple was long a shared religious space. Many people living in Thailand’s northeastern Isan region on the border have the same Khmer ancestry as the Cambodians. Some have relatives across the border. On both sides, many Buddhists revere Hindu deities, maintaining the crossover of faiths born centuries ago.

Kim Chantrea, 26, a temple cleaner, recalled how, as a child, she used to see Thai tourists cross into the temple without even having to show their passports. “The people who used to come before, — they are like us, they saw that the temple was beautiful,” said Ms. Kim. “They came to pray for peace.”

But in 2008, after UNESCO listed the temple as a World Heritage Site, fighting broke out between Thailand and Cambodia for the first time in decades. The damage at the temple then was minimal, but ever since, no tourists have been able to access it from the Thai side.

Clashes erupted again last year. Temple workers said that they took cover in the pavilions and survived only on bottled water for three consecutive days.

Sen Sokha, 37, a temple caretaker, said she saw bombs falling from airplanes. “Just thinking about it makes us cry,” she said. “Seeing the place we used to work at, keep clean, and take care of, now destroyed like this.”

Like her colleagues, she is still living in tents donated by China, even after the latest cease-fire was signed in late December, because the Cambodian authorities do not believe it is safe for them to return home.

International law requires both Thailand and Cambodia to protect cultural sites in the event of armed conflict.

The 1.8 square miles of land surrounding the temple are claimed by both nations. In the distance, Thai military camps were visible. Cambodian bunkers were built into the path leading up to the temple.

Before the pandemic, Preah Vihear received about 10,000 visitors a year, a fraction of the two million who go to Angkor Wat, according to Pheng Sam Oeun, the deputy director general of the National Authority for Preah Vihear.

Cambodia has documented 142 damaged sites at the temple, with damage more extensive from the fighting in December, said Mr. Pheng, a trained archaeologist who has worked at the temple since 2008.

It is preparing to present its preliminary assessment of the damage to a UNESCO body that is overseeing the restoration of the temple, he added. The group includes the United States, China, India and Thailand.

Still, many carvings have survived, including “The Churning of the Ocean of Milk,” which depicts a Hindu myth in which gods and demons churn the ocean to create the elixir of immortality.

During our nearly three-hour tour, several workers from Cambodia’s demining authority continued to nail stakes in the ground, putting up placards, some of which read “Art 105 mm,” a reference to artillery rounds.

Nearby, Mr. Pheng walked among the rubble, showing reporters one of the most famous and historically significant records at the site. It was an inscription on a pillar that told of how King Suryavarman II, who built Angkor Wat, sent his high priest from the city of Angkor to Preah Vihear to cement his authority over the region.

Mr. Pheng then pointed to a large chunk of the pillar that had broken off. He said the stone could be replaced but not the carving or script. That, he said, was gone.

[Copyright of The New York Times].

0 comment

 Our Khmer clothes are beautiful, no matter what nationality you are, they are appropriate. Khmer veil

0 comment

 While Siam is strongly opposing Cambodia's inclusion of Khmer wedding ceremonies in the UNESCO World Heritage List, please let the Cambodian people be calm and trust our Ministry of Culture and Fine Arts 


And join in taking, posting and sharing all the beautiful pictures related to our traditional clothing (within the rules) as much as possible, instead of responding with inappropriate words.

0 comment

 Cambodia Files New Protest Against Thailand Over Border Encroachment

PHNOM PENH, March 18, 2026 — Cambodia has lodged a fresh formal protest against Thailand, accusing Thai armed forces of continued encroachment and unlawful activities along their shared border in violation of a ceasefire agreement and international law.

In a press release issued on Tuesday, Cambodia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation said Thai forces had carried out land-clearing, road construction and infrastructure development in multiple locations inside Cambodian territory following the December 27, 2025 ceasefire.

The statement cited several areas of concern, including zones near Tamone Thom Temple in Oddar Meanchey province, Mom Bei and An Seh in Preah Vihear province, and parts of Banteay Ampil district, where Thai troops were reported to have used heavy machinery, built roads and constructed permanent structures.

Cambodia also alleged that Thai forces, in some cases accompanied by monks, had erected Buddha statues and raised Thai national flags in disputed locations, which Phnom Penh said lie entirely within Cambodian sovereignty as defined by historical treaties and internationally recognized maps.

The government said such actions violate the 2000 Memorandum of Understanding on border demarcation, as well as commitments under the General Border Committee (GBC) ceasefire agreement, which includes measures aimed at de-escalation and maintaining the status quo.

“Cambodia calls upon Thailand to immediately cease these activities, refrain from further unilateral actions, and fully implement all relevant agreements in good faith,” the statement said.

Phnom Penh reaffirmed its commitment to resolving border disputes peacefully and in accordance with international law, while stressing that territorial boundaries must not be altered by force or unilateral actions.

Tensions along the Cambodia–Thailand border have periodically flared despite ongoing diplomatic mechanisms, with both sides pledging to maintain stability while pursuing long-term demarcation efforts.

0 comment

Thailand/Siam has shown a light image on the international stage! Thailand is a sovereign country

with a formal constitution and government, but Thailand does not respect international law. What kind of country is it?


When there are internal problems, the demonstration of military power and border tensions always become the theme of Thailand÷

-the use of force

-the demonstration of power

-and the tension in the surrounding border areas is raising questions for the international community÷

 Does such an act show that Thailand is strong or weak to the world? Acts of not respecting the laws of war, violating Cambodia's sovereignty, not respecting international law, Thailand can sign but cannot respect what?

 And on the international stage, the country that often uses force is Thailand, which is clearly seen by the international community?

 What is the role of the major powers in the world? In maintaining regional stability?


💬 Please share your comments 


Reported by: Thou Sovan Daravuth 


#InternationalPerspective #RegionalStability #SoutheastAsia

0 comment

The Board of Peace welcomes Cambodia as a founding member of our growing international organization.
0 comment

History of “Ghost Mountain – The Second Killing Fields of Cambodia in Thailand”
•By: Tabor
I-(Ghost Mountain – The Second Killing Fields of Cambodia in Thailand)
1. Meaning of the name “Ghost Mountain”
Ghost Mountain is the name that Cambodians and border residents call a mountain area located near the Cambodian-Thai border near Preah Vihear Temple. The name comes from the many horrific deaths of Cambodian civilians fleeing the war and the Khmer Rouge regime in the late 1970s and early 1980s.
2. Historical context
After the fall of the Khmer Rouge regime in 1979, hundreds of thousands of Cambodians fled the country, hoping to find safety in Thailand. Some of the escape routes passed through the mountains and forests near Preah Vihear Temple, which were extremely dangerous areas.
3. Why it is called “The Second Killing Fields”
The term “Killing Fields” is used to compare it to the killing fields in Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge regime.
At the Ghost Mountain, many Cambodians:
• Died from lack of food and water
• Died from disease
• Died from landmines
• Died from shooting and border fighting
• Died from push back when trying to cross into Thailand
Many bodies were not buried properly, leading to the belief that the area is haunted by ghosts and spirits of the dead.
4. The role of Preah Vihear Temple
The area around Preah Vihear Temple is not only a cultural heritage site, but also a strategic area during the war.
Fighting between the army, armed groups, and border guards has left many civilians trapped and dead in this mountain area.
5. The Ghost Mountain in social memory
For refugees and survivors:
• The Ghost Mountain is a symbol of suffering
• A witness to the loss of Cambodian lives
• An unforgettable history
For researchers and documentary makers, this topic is called
“Ghost Mountain – The Second Killing Fields of Cambodia in Thailand” to make the world understand that the suffering of the Cambodian people did not end within the borders of Cambodia.
6. Historical significance
Ghost Mountain is part of the painful history of the Cambodian people, which shows:
• War and politics can kill civilians inhumanly
• Refugees are victims, not war-mongers
• History must be remembered so that it does not happen again
II-Why Thailand reacted and made a film about “Ghost Mountain – The Second Killing Fields of Cambodia in Thailand”.
About why Thailand reacted and made a film about Ghost Mountain – The Second Killing Fields of Cambodia in Thailand:
1. Historical and transnational political context
The film is directly related to the painful past of the Cambodian people during the Khmer Rouge era and the flight of refugees into Thai territory. The commemoration and presentation of violent events, killings and human rights violations on Thai territory raises serious questions about the role of the Thai state and relevant authorities in the past. Therefore, Thailand’s reaction is not a simple cultural issue, but a historical political issue that can affect the sovereignty and legitimacy of the state.
2. The Right to Mediate Power over Historical Memory
According to academic theory, society and the state tend to control “collective memory” in order to maintain political stability and national identity. This film can be seen as presenting a narrative that is different from the official Thai state narrative, which raises questions about “who has the right to tell the past”. Therefore, reacting or controlling the film’s release is a way to protect that official narrative.
3. Concerns about human rights and accountability
The film raises issues of human rights abuses, deaths and disappearances of Cambodian refugees on Thai soil. From an international perspective, these issues may lead to a reexamination of the Thai state’s accountability in the Cold War era and the geopolitical context of the region. Thus, Thailand’s response can be understood as a defense against human rights pressure and international criticism.
4. The role of film as a political and cultural tool
Film is not only an art form but also a tool of “soft power” that can shape or destroy public opinion. The Thai production or response to this film shows that the state is aware of the media’s ability to shape political culture and public discourse about the past.
5. Conclusion
In summary, the reaction and production of the film Ghost Mountain – The Second Killing Fields of Cambodia in Thailand is not just an artistic issue, but an intersection between history, politics, human rights, and the management of social memory. From an academic perspective, it shows how a state attempts to manage a painful past in order to maintain its stability and national identity.
III- Gains/benefits that Thailand gains when the Thai state agrees to lease land or allow UNHCR to open refugee camps on its territory.
1. Analytical Context
A state’s consent to open refugee camps is not a purely humanitarian decision, but a political–economic–international calculus. In the case of Thailand, it can be analyzed in terms of the Political Economy of Refugees, International Relations (IR), and Humanitarian Governance.
2. International Political Gains
2.1 Improving legitimacy and international integrity International Legitimacy
By allowing UNHCR to open refugee camps, Thailand can present itself as a “responsible state” in the international system. Although Thailand is not a full member of the 1951 Refugee Convention, cooperation with UNHCR helps reduce criticism from the international community and human rights organizations.
From a constructivist IR theory perspective, such humanitarian behavior helps create a state identity that can shape international perceptions of Thailand.
2.2 Soft Power and Diplomatic Capital
Being a host state for international humanitarian operations allows Thailand to accumulate soft power and diplomatic capital. It can be used as a political bargaining tool, especially in the context of the Cold War and post-Cold War, when Thailand wanted to maintain good relations with international organizations and donor countries.
3. Economic Gains
3.1 Direct Revenue and Regional Benefits
Leases of land or permits to use state land generate direct revenue or indirect benefits for the state and local authorities. In addition, the presence of UNHCR and development organizations (NGOs) creates a camp economy, such as:
• Employment for local populations
• Access to basic services and goods
• Investment in infrastructure (roads, water, electricity)
According to the development-security nexus theory, humanitarian assistance can become a tool for the development of border areas that have been overlooked.
3.2 Cost Externalization
By having UNHCR and international donors manage the camps, Thailand can transfer the costs of food, health, and human security to the international system. This is a burden-sharing principle that allows the host state to maintain its public capital.
4. Security Gains
4.1 Population Management
From a security studies perspective, refugee camps help the Thai state:
• Manage the movement of refugees
• Identify and mobilize
• Separate civilians from combatants
This helps reduce security risks in border areas and intermingle with local society.
4.2 Political Buffer Zone
The refugee camps can act as a kind of buffer zone between Thailand and political crises in neighboring countries (especially Cambodia). It helps Thailand maintain political distance from the conflict while still being able to control its impact.
5. Benefits of Memory and Narrative Control
By allowing UNHCR to manage the camps, rather than directly integrating refugees into Thai society, the Thai state can maintain the narrative that it is a “humanitarian host” and not a “participant” in the crisis. This is consistent with the theories of memory politics and state responsibility avoidance.
6. Conclusion
In summary, Thailand’s agreement to allow UNHCR to lease or use land to open refugee camps can be understood as a decision with strategic reasons, not pure compassion. Thailand gains:
1. International legitimacy and soft power
2. Economic interests and regional development
3. Security and population management
4. Ability to manage narrative and political past
————————————————-
The word narrative means a story or a way of speaking/writing to present a sequence of events, with clear characters, time, and context.
Brief definition
• Narrative is a way of telling a story
• Can be true or fictional
• Used to convey a meaning, point of view, or message
For example
• In literature: short stories, novels, and fairy tales all have narrative
• In everyday life: a person tells an experience that he or she has had
• In politics or journalism: “political narrative” means the way a story is told to create a certain point of view
Narrative is not just a “story,” but a way of organizing and presenting that story for the listener or reader to understand.

0 comment

At 9:40 AM on 24 December 2025, the Thai military fired artillery shells into a Cambodian civilian area in Koun Trei Village (near National Road No. 5), Koub Commune, Ou Chrov District, Banteay Meanchey Province, resulting in two civilians, including one child, sustaining serious injuries.

0 comment