History of the Mekha Bucha Festival
Cambodia has long been a Buddhist country, with over 95% of the population practicing Buddhism, and the constitution recognizes Buddhism as the state religion. Among them, the number of monks and monasteries has been increasing steadily. According to statistics from 2013, there are more than 4,500 monasteries and more than 54,000 monks, which is a great source of pride. According to history, Buddhism first originated in India. After the Buddha passed away about 218 years ago, a king named King Dhammasoka Maharaja ascended the throne in the capital of Bataliputta of the Magadha kingdom. He had great power and authority. He converted to Buddhism and became the king of the Third Sangha in 234 B.E. After the Third Sangha, King Dhammasok Maharaja sent envoys to various countries in the world with the aim of spreading Buddhism. He is said to have opened the doors of the world and enlightened the people to know Buddhism since then.
Fortunately, Cambodia also received the influence of spreading Buddhism from the sending of two envoys, named Sonatthera and Uttaraththera, who brought Buddhism to the land of Suvarnabhumi in the third century (234 B.E.).
Cambodia is not only influenced by Buddhism alone, but also by Brahmanism and other cultures from India. However, because of some of its culture, traditions, and customs, it is similar to Khmer culture, traditions, and customs, and combined with the Khmer ancestors who are good at adapting foreign cultures to make them their own, it is difficult to distinguish between one being Indian and the other Khmer. Buddhism is a religion that is a synthesis of Khmer culture, traditions, and customs, and together with the Buddha's teachings, there is a clear reason why the Khmer people have always respected and loved it.
Temples and monks play a very important role in Khmer society. Temples are not only places for religious ceremonies, but also a place to spread culture, civilization, and a place to show solidarity in Khmer society. In short, they are the center of Khmer culture. Monks represent the disciples of the Blessed One and play an important role as teachers of ethics, medicine, literature, and mental health, and they also serve as arbitrators in resolving disputes, ensuring the well-being of all citizens in society.
Speaking of Buddhist practices in Cambodia, many festivals are celebrated, including major festivals related to Buddhism:
Phambin Festival, Cho Preah Vassa Festival, Kham Preah Vassa Festival, Kathin Festival, Mekha Bucha Festival, and Visakha Bucha Festival, etc. However, in this article, I would like to mention only Mekha Bucha Festival to explain the history of Mekha Bucha Festival, what its meaning is, and why all Buddhists must celebrate this festival, whether it is Cambodian Buddhists or Buddhists from other countries in the world. As long as they are Buddhists, they must celebrate this festival forever.
According to the Book of Royal Ceremonies, Part 2, the history of Visakha Bucha only mentions the history of Visakha Bucha, which occurred during the reign of King Hirarakramathipdei, King Ang Duong, who reigned during the Udtung era in 1397.
From this, we can conclude that the Mekha Bucha was likely started in this Buddhist era as well, because both festivals commemorate the anniversaries of the great Mahaphilakthi of the ascetic Gotama, the teacher of humans and deities.
In 1999, the members of the United Nations unanimously approved and recognized Visakha Bucha, as well as the Buddhist Mekha Bucha, as international holidays, allowing all Buddhist countries to celebrate Visakha Bucha at the United Nations Headquarters. Although not universally recognized, Mekha Bucha is celebrated by Buddhists around the world and is considered a national holiday.
As is the custom of most Cambodian Buddhists, every time the Makha Bucha festival arrives, they always prepare, arrange, and clean temples throughout the Kingdom of Cambodia by hoisting the national flag, the Buddhist flag, the Buddha image, the Sakyamuni chedi, the relics of the Buddha, including the sacred utensils, playing the music of the sacred instruments, the offerings of offerings, including the offerings of incense, flowers, and fragrant incense, all carefully selected according to the Khmer culture, civilization, and customs, in preparation for the celebration of the Makha Bucha festival.
The celebration of the Makha Bucha festival is to celebrate three major events:
1/ To celebrate the fourfold assembly
2/ To celebrate the day on which the Blessed One delivered the Patimokkha sermon
3/ To celebrate the day on which the Blessed One established the Sangha.
Once upon a time, the Blessed One was living in

 In the cave (cave) named Sokarkhata on Mount Kichchakod (a mountain with a peak like a smart animal) near the city of Rajagaha, to recite the Tikānkha Sutta, the Tikānkha Paripvājaka, which describes the four great phenomena that do not occur regularly.
At that time, the Dharmasenapadī Kunsiyadhamma, who was sitting on the side of the seat (behind the back) that had offered the Blessed One, pondered over the essence of the Dhamma and attained the highest arahantship of the disciples of Paramināṇa and Pāṇa16.
The Paripuvajaka monastery also completed its journey. When the sun was about to set, the Buddha descended from the peak of Kichchakod and went to the Veluvana monastery, where he held a council of four disciples.
A/ The first event, the Chaturanga Sannibhata, has four parts, namely the assembly with four parts:
1/ The day of the full moon, the day when His Holiness performed the Visuddha Pooja
2/ On that day, the 1250 monks and nuns gathered without prior appointment and came to the Buddha's house on the same day at the same time
3/ All of those monks and nuns were arahants who had achieved the six precepts
4/ All of those monks and nuns were lay monks (having not been ordained, had not shaved their heads, (Just by going to the Blessed One and hearing the Dhamma, he became a monk like them.) This Chaturanga Sannibha or assembly of disciples only happened once during the Buddha’s lifetime, not many times.
B/Event 2: The day he gave the Patimokkha Precepts The Patimokkha Precepts are a series of precepts that the Buddha gave to guide all beings to be free from suffering. The Buddha himself preached the Patimokkha teachings, which consist of three and a half verses of the Buddha’s words, which are translated into Khmer as follows:
Adivasanakhanti is patience, which is the highest virtue. The Buddhas have always taught that Nirvana is the highest virtue. A monk who kills other animals or oppresses other animals is not a monk.
Not committing any sin, completing merit, and cultivating one’s mind to overflowing are the three teachings of the Buddhas.
Not speaking abusively, not harassing, concentrating on the path of enlightenment, being a guide in the quiet state of sitting, lying, and standing, and striving in the six mindfulness practices: these are the teachings of the Buddhas.
After he had preached the Patimokkha sermon, our venerable master Gotama proclaimed the appointment of two monks as the chief disciples of all the monks, appointing Sariputta as the right-hand chief disciple, the chief disciple of all the monks, the disciple of the side of great wisdom, and appointing Mahamoggalla as the left-hand chief disciple, the chief disciple of all the monks, the disciple of the side of great power. C/ The third event, the day of the Buddha's death, was the day when the evil demon approached the Blessed One and pleaded with him, saying, "Venerable sir, now may the Blessed One enter into Nibbana. May the Blessed One enter into Nibbana. Venerable sir, now is the time for the Blessed One's passing away." The Buddha replied to the evil demon's words, "O evil demon, be less anxious. The Tathagata's passing away is not long now. Three months have passed from today, and the Tathagata will enter into Nibbana." Our great teacher, the Buddha, set the date of his birth and death, that is, he set the date on which he would pass away and enter into Mahaparinibbana, which is the departure from this world without returning, the departure from the cycle of life without any regrets, because the path he walked was the path of peace and tranquility, free from all suffering.
Please be happy!!!!!!

#Buddhism

History of the Mekha Bucha Festival

0 comment

Like comment

Write a comment......

The Board of Peace welcomes Cambodia as a founding member of our growing international organization.

#News

The Board of Peace welcomes Cambodia as a founding member of our growing international organization.

0 comment

Like comment

Write a comment......

History of “Ghost Mountain – The Second Killing Fields of Cambodia in Thailand”
•By: Tabor
I-(Ghost Mountain – The Second Killing Fields of Cambodia in Thailand)
1. Meaning of the name “Ghost Mountain”
Ghost Mountain is the name that Cambodians and border residents call a mountain area located near the Cambodian-Thai border near Preah Vihear Temple. The name comes from the many horrific deaths of Cambodian civilians fleeing the war and the Khmer Rouge regime in the late 1970s and early 1980s.
2. Historical context
After the fall of the Khmer Rouge regime in 1979, hundreds of thousands of Cambodians fled the country, hoping to find safety in Thailand. Some of the escape routes passed through the mountains and forests near Preah Vihear Temple, which were extremely dangerous areas.
3. Why it is called “The Second Killing Fields”
The term “Killing Fields” is used to compare it to the killing fields in Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge regime.
At the Ghost Mountain, many Cambodians:
• Died from lack of food and water
• Died from disease
• Died from landmines
• Died from shooting and border fighting
• Died from push back when trying to cross into Thailand
Many bodies were not buried properly, leading to the belief that the area is haunted by ghosts and spirits of the dead.
4. The role of Preah Vihear Temple
The area around Preah Vihear Temple is not only a cultural heritage site, but also a strategic area during the war.
Fighting between the army, armed groups, and border guards has left many civilians trapped and dead in this mountain area.
5. The Ghost Mountain in social memory
For refugees and survivors:
• The Ghost Mountain is a symbol of suffering
• A witness to the loss of Cambodian lives
• An unforgettable history
For researchers and documentary makers, this topic is called
“Ghost Mountain – The Second Killing Fields of Cambodia in Thailand” to make the world understand that the suffering of the Cambodian people did not end within the borders of Cambodia.
6. Historical significance
Ghost Mountain is part of the painful history of the Cambodian people, which shows:
• War and politics can kill civilians inhumanly
• Refugees are victims, not war-mongers
• History must be remembered so that it does not happen again
II-Why Thailand reacted and made a film about “Ghost Mountain – The Second Killing Fields of Cambodia in Thailand”.
About why Thailand reacted and made a film about Ghost Mountain – The Second Killing Fields of Cambodia in Thailand:
1. Historical and transnational political context
The film is directly related to the painful past of the Cambodian people during the Khmer Rouge era and the flight of refugees into Thai territory. The commemoration and presentation of violent events, killings and human rights violations on Thai territory raises serious questions about the role of the Thai state and relevant authorities in the past. Therefore, Thailand’s reaction is not a simple cultural issue, but a historical political issue that can affect the sovereignty and legitimacy of the state.
2. The Right to Mediate Power over Historical Memory
According to academic theory, society and the state tend to control “collective memory” in order to maintain political stability and national identity. This film can be seen as presenting a narrative that is different from the official Thai state narrative, which raises questions about “who has the right to tell the past”. Therefore, reacting or controlling the film’s release is a way to protect that official narrative.
3. Concerns about human rights and accountability
The film raises issues of human rights abuses, deaths and disappearances of Cambodian refugees on Thai soil. From an international perspective, these issues may lead to a reexamination of the Thai state’s accountability in the Cold War era and the geopolitical context of the region. Thus, Thailand’s response can be understood as a defense against human rights pressure and international criticism.
4. The role of film as a political and cultural tool
Film is not only an art form but also a tool of “soft power” that can shape or destroy public opinion. The Thai production or response to this film shows that the state is aware of the media’s ability to shape political culture and public discourse about the past.
5. Conclusion
In summary, the reaction and production of the film Ghost Mountain – The Second Killing Fields of Cambodia in Thailand is not just an artistic issue, but an intersection between history, politics, human rights, and the management of social memory. From an academic perspective, it shows how a state attempts to manage a painful past in order to maintain its stability and national identity.
III- Gains/benefits that Thailand gains when the Thai state agrees to lease land or allow UNHCR to open refugee camps on its territory.
1. Analytical Context
A state’s consent to open refugee camps is not a purely humanitarian decision, but a political–economic–international calculus. In the case of Thailand, it can be analyzed in terms of the Political Economy of Refugees, International Relations (IR), and Humanitarian Governance.
2. International Political Gains
2.1 Improving legitimacy and international integrity International Legitimacy
By allowing UNHCR to open refugee camps, Thailand can present itself as a “responsible state” in the international system. Although Thailand is not a full member of the 1951 Refugee Convention, cooperation with UNHCR helps reduce criticism from the international community and human rights organizations.
From a constructivist IR theory perspective, such humanitarian behavior helps create a state identity that can shape international perceptions of Thailand.
2.2 Soft Power and Diplomatic Capital
Being a host state for international humanitarian operations allows Thailand to accumulate soft power and diplomatic capital. It can be used as a political bargaining tool, especially in the context of the Cold War and post-Cold War, when Thailand wanted to maintain good relations with international organizations and donor countries.
3. Economic Gains
3.1 Direct Revenue and Regional Benefits
Leases of land or permits to use state land generate direct revenue or indirect benefits for the state and local authorities. In addition, the presence of UNHCR and development organizations (NGOs) creates a camp economy, such as:
• Employment for local populations
• Access to basic services and goods
• Investment in infrastructure (roads, water, electricity)
According to the development-security nexus theory, humanitarian assistance can become a tool for the development of border areas that have been overlooked.
3.2 Cost Externalization
By having UNHCR and international donors manage the camps, Thailand can transfer the costs of food, health, and human security to the international system. This is a burden-sharing principle that allows the host state to maintain its public capital.
4. Security Gains
4.1 Population Management
From a security studies perspective, refugee camps help the Thai state:
• Manage the movement of refugees
• Identify and mobilize
• Separate civilians from combatants
This helps reduce security risks in border areas and intermingle with local society.
4.2 Political Buffer Zone
The refugee camps can act as a kind of buffer zone between Thailand and political crises in neighboring countries (especially Cambodia). It helps Thailand maintain political distance from the conflict while still being able to control its impact.
5. Benefits of Memory and Narrative Control
By allowing UNHCR to manage the camps, rather than directly integrating refugees into Thai society, the Thai state can maintain the narrative that it is a “humanitarian host” and not a “participant” in the crisis. This is consistent with the theories of memory politics and state responsibility avoidance.
6. Conclusion
In summary, Thailand’s agreement to allow UNHCR to lease or use land to open refugee camps can be understood as a decision with strategic reasons, not pure compassion. Thailand gains:
1. International legitimacy and soft power
2. Economic interests and regional development
3. Security and population management
4. Ability to manage narrative and political past
————————————————-
The word narrative means a story or a way of speaking/writing to present a sequence of events, with clear characters, time, and context.
Brief definition
• Narrative is a way of telling a story
• Can be true or fictional
• Used to convey a meaning, point of view, or message
For example
• In literature: short stories, novels, and fairy tales all have narrative
• In everyday life: a person tells an experience that he or she has had
• In politics or journalism: “political narrative” means the way a story is told to create a certain point of view
Narrative is not just a “story,” but a way of organizing and presenting that story for the listener or reader to understand.

#News

History of “Ghost Mountain – The Second Killing Fields of Cambodia in Thailand” •By: Tabor

0 comment

Like comment

Write a comment......

At 9:40 AM on 24 December 2025, the Thai military fired artillery shells into a Cambodian civilian area in Koun Trei Village (near National Road No. 5), Koub Commune, Ou Chrov District, Banteay Meanchey Province, resulting in two civilians, including one child, sustaining serious injuries.

#News

At 9:40 AM on 24 December 2025, the Thai military fired artillery shells into a Cambodian civilian area in Koun Trei Village (near National Road No. 5)

0 comment

Like comment

Write a comment......

Both China and the United States, if they do not want to be seen as a threat in their talks with Thailand, must first understand the customs of this nation clearly. Otherwise, they will surely be humiliated, because Thailand will definitely take the blame for itself, blame Cambodia for its abuse, and refuse to enter the negotiation table. Therefore, to protect their honor, the two superpowers must use their influence to put more pressure on Thailand than just diplomatic mechanisms, so that Thailand will find it difficult to refuse. I understand that the Thai side's shooting at Cambodia for the past 13 days has certainly made both superpowers see clearly who the real victims are. The Cambodian people firmly believe that they will get justice through their common sense.

credit by kosal chum

#News

Both China and the United States

0 comment

Like comment

Write a comment......

l am proud to witness the enduring strength of the Khmer nation at a time when our country is facing difficulties due to the invasion by the neighboring country. His Majesty the King, national leaders, government officials at all levels, and Cambodian citizens of all faiths and religions, both at home and abroad, have demonstrated a strong sense of national solidarity in support of our heroic armed forces and the national police, who are carrying out their missions with bravery to protect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Cambodia. May the great strength of the Khmer nation continue to serve as a powerful force that supports and strengthens our heroic armed forces and the national police as they continue to carry out their mission to defend the nation's territory. The Royal Government stands with the people, as well as with our heroic armed forces and the national police, at all times.

#News

l am proud to witness the enduring strength of the Khmer nation at a time when our country is facing difficulties due to the invasion by the neighboring country

0 comment

Like comment

Write a comment......

When Language Escalates Conflict and Process Prevents It

Words carry weight in times of conflict. They can calm tensions or harden them. But words alone cannot establish responsibility, and emotion cannot replace verification.

Recent reactions to President Donald Trump’s description of a landmine incident along the Thailand–Cambodia border as a “roadside accident” have focused on perceived disrespect toward Thai soldiers and national dignity. The emotional response is understandable. Injured soldiers are not abstractions. They are individuals with families and communities whose suffering deserves seriousness.

Yet diplomacy depends on precision, not sentiment. Especially when tensions are active and escalation remains a risk.

The key issue is not whether the phrase was inelegant. It likely was. The more consequential question is whether language should be treated as a verdict before facts are independently established.

Landmines are not matters of interpretation. They are weapons governed by international law, subject to investigation, mapping, clearance obligations, and verification mechanisms. Determining who planted them, when, and under what authority requires transparent processes and credible evidence, not repetition of claims.

So far, public discourse has relied heavily on assertion. Claims of deliberate placement, references to previous incidents, and accusations of inaction have been presented as settled conclusions rather than disputed facts. That approach may satisfy domestic audiences, but it does little to persuade neutral observers or external mediators whose confidence is essential for de escalation.

History should also be handled with care. Thailand and the United States share a long and consequential relationship. That history explains heightened expectations of attentiveness, not immunity from inquiry. Durable alliances are built on the ability to disagree, to question, and to examine facts openly, especially under pressure.

Calls for a ceasefire based on truth are legitimate. But truth in conflict zones is not declared unilaterally. It is established through joint investigation, third party monitoring, and procedures that both sides accept as binding even when politically inconvenient.

This is where ASEAN’s role matters. Its credibility will not rest on moral rhetoric, but on whether it can facilitate verification, restraint, and mechanisms that prevent incidents from being instrumentalized by any party. Regional stability depends less on narrative dominance than on agreed process.

The greater risk now is not an imprecise phrase. It is allowing language to lock positions before facts are fully known. Once that happens, even sincere appeals for peace lose credibility.

Respect for soldiers, civilians, and national dignity is not undermined by investigation. It is protected by it.

Peace does not begin with agreement on blame.

It begins with agreement on process.

Midnight

 

#News

When Language Escalates Conflict and Process Prevents It Words carry weight in times of conflict

0 comment

Like comment

Write a comment......

Why “Chinese Made Weapons” Suddenly Matter in the Thailand Cambodia Conflict

When China publicly stated that its arms trade with Cambodia and Thailand is unrelated to the current border conflict, it was not intervening in the dispute. It was drawing a boundary. That boundary matters, because the statement did not emerge from mediation efforts or ceasefire negotiations, but from a growing attempt to associate the conflict with external suppliers, specifically China, through repeated references to Chinese made weapons appearing in battlefield reporting and in Thai claims of captured equipment.

The existence of Chinese origin weapons in Cambodian inventories is not the central question. Cambodia, like Thailand, has purchased arms from China for years, just as both have sourced equipment from multiple external partners. What matters is why weapon origin is being emphasized now, during an active escalation, and what strategic function that emphasis serves at this specific moment.

Looked at structurally, Thailand’s emphasis on weapon origin performs several roles at once. It shifts the conflict away from a traditional border dispute rooted in historical ambiguities and contested maps toward a security narrative centered on civilian protection. Once advanced or long range systems are mentioned, especially when linked to a major external producer, the justification for air power, deeper strikes, or broader defensive measures becomes easier to articulate. The focus moves from contested terrain to potential threats against civilian infrastructure. In that frame, escalation is no longer framed as aggression, but as prevention.

Beyond domestic framing, the same emphasis operates outward. Thailand does not need to accuse China of direct involvement. Repeated proximity is sufficient. Weapons, origin, battlefield. For international audiences, the implication forms on its own, especially through global news circuits that compress complex disputes into simple cause and effect stories. China’s response, warning against speculation and malicious hype, is best understood as a reaction to this implication rather than to any formal accusation.

The weapons narrative also does not stand alone. It appears alongside practical pressure tools that shape the battlefield without firing a shot, particularly fuel and transit constraints. Reuters has reported Thailand cutting a fuel route through a Laos border point because of fears supplies were being diverted to Cambodia, and also reported Thai consideration of blocking fuel exports and labeling areas near Cambodian ports as high risk. These are not separate stories. They are part of the same architecture, where capability and sustainment are treated as legitimate security targets.

Inside Thailand, the political function of this framing is equally important. Governments escalate within political constraints, not in isolation. Presenting military action as protection against advanced threats stabilizes public support and limits internal dissent. When civilian sites are named and external suppliers implied, restraint can be portrayed as negligence, while firmness appears prudent. In this sense, the narrative serves internal legitimacy as much as external positioning.

The effect on Cambodia is more constraining than confrontational. Once its military posture is described through the lens of externally sourced capability, its defensive explanations face heightened scrutiny regardless of when the weapons were acquired or how they are employed. The timing of the narrative matters more than the timing of procurement. Cambodia is pushed into a reactive posture, forced to manage optics as much as actions, and forced to answer insinuations even when the underlying facts are not fully established.

Seen in this context, Beijing’s response is procedural rather than emotive. China is not denying that it sells weapons. It is rejecting the leap from trade to authorship. That distinction is central to China’s regional posture. If arms exports are allowed to imply responsibility for downstream conflicts, neutrality collapses and arms trade becomes a permanent diplomatic liability. China is therefore drawing a red line early. Procurement origin does not equal battlefield intent.

There is also a balance calculation at work that is easy to miss if you only look at Cambodia. Thailand itself has been a significant importer of Chinese arms in recent years, which makes any simple story of China backing only one side structurally weak. This is precisely why Beijing moves quickly to flatten the narrative before it hardens into a proxy label. Beijing is protecting its relationships on both fronts and preserving room to influence outcomes without becoming the story.

Equally significant is China’s concern with precedent. This is not only about this border conflict. It is about future insulation. If weapon origin becomes a default proxy for political responsibility, then every future conflict where Chinese systems appear will generate the same blame structure, regardless of when the sale occurred or what the buyer chose to do years later. Beijing’s language is aimed at preventing that norm from forming.

Crucially, the most consequential details remain unresolved, and readers should understand why that matters. There is no publicly verified timeline for when the highlighted weapons entered Cambodian inventory. Independent confirmation of seizure claims remains limited in open reporting. There is no visibility into private diplomatic exchanges between Beijing, Bangkok, Phnom Penh, or ASEAN intermediaries. These gaps are not incidental. They are the terrain on which the next phase of narrative contestation will unfold, because whoever fills the gaps first will shape what the world believes happened.

Taken together, this episode signals a shift. The conflict is no longer defined solely by troop movements or territorial control. It is increasingly shaped by legitimacy, escalation permission, and international perception. Labels now travel faster than facts, and implications harden before verification. This is why short statements and captured images can carry strategic weight far beyond their technical meaning.

Thailand’s emphasis on Chinese made weapons should therefore be understood as a strategic framing instrument, not proof of a proxy war. China’s rejection of that framing is reputation management, not denial of trade. Both moves are calculated. Neither resolves the underlying dispute.

What this moment ultimately reveals is that the conflict has entered a phase where narrative control directly affects military and diplomatic options. Recognizing that shift is the difference between reacting to headlines and understanding the structure beneath them. China did not speak because it chose a side. It spoke because it refused to be written into a story that would constrain every move it makes next.

Midnight

-----------

Sources used for verification include Reuters on China’s statement and on Thailand’s fuel and maritime pressure measures, plus Thai reporting cited in the same news cycle, and arms transfer context drawn from SIPRI linked summaries.

 

#News

Why Chinese Made Weapons” Suddenly Matter in the Thailand Cambodia Conflict When China publicly stated that its arms trade with Cambodia and Thailand is unrelated to the current border conflict

0 comment

Like comment

Write a comment......

The agreement to involve ASEAN observers is a procedural shift, not a resolution.

In Phase 1, this works. Meetings and observers lower headline pressure and move the conflict from bilateral narrative control into a multilateral setting. That contains escalation in the short term and buys time.

Whether it works beyond that depends on Phase 2 and Phase 3.

In Phase 2, observers must become operational: real access, regular reporting, and mutual verification. If observers remain symbolic or restricted, the process risks becoming delay rather than de-escalation.

Phase 3 depends on accountability. Once ASEAN places its credibility behind the process, prolonged vagueness carries a cost not only for the parties, but for ASEAN itself. At that point, procedure either hardens into constraint or quietly stalls.

So this is containment, not peace yet.

It works temporarily. Long-term success depends on whether mechanisms replace conditions and whether observers move from optics to function.

Midnight

 

#News

The agreement to involve ASEAN observers is a procedural shift, not a resolution. In Phase 1

0 comment

Like comment

Write a comment......

When Categories Replace Facts | Why Distinctions Matter in Conflict

In contemporary conflicts, pressure is rarely applied only through force or diplomacy. It is increasingly applied through categorization. Countries are quietly reframed as “risk environments,” “problem spaces,” or “security concerns,” not through formal findings, but through repetition, proximity, and implication.

This matters because once a category sticks, facts no longer need to be proven. Procedures are replaced by impressions. Acts are replaced by character.

Cambodia’s current position is clear and verifiable. The central issue before the region and the international community concerns military actions affecting Cambodian territory and the urgent need for de-escalation through established diplomatic and legal mechanisms. These questions are governed by international law, observation frameworks, and regional processes designed to prevent escalation and protect civilians.

It is precisely because this position is structurally strong that unrelated narratives begin to surface alongside it.

In recent weeks, discourse around transnational online crime and platform enforcement has appeared in close proximity to a territorial dispute. These issues are real and regional in nature. They are addressed through law-enforcement cooperation, financial oversight, and technical enforcement across multiple jurisdictions in Asia-Pacific. But their sudden prominence at this moment, and their rhetorical linkage to an ongoing conflict, deserves careful attention.

This is not about denying the existence of transnational crime. It is about refusing narrative migration.

International practice distinguishes criminal enforcement from questions of territorial integrity precisely to prevent politicization and escalation. Criminal activity is handled through investigative and judicial channels. Territorial disputes and military conduct are addressed through diplomacy, ceasefire mechanisms, and international law. When these domains are conflated, accountability weakens rather than strengthens. Verifiable actions are displaced by generalized suspicion, and resolution becomes harder rather than closer.

Such framing has consequences beyond headlines. Risk language travels downstream into compliance systems, transport controls, financial scrutiny, insurance decisions, and travel advisories. What begins as commentary can quietly become friction. This is why precision matters. Urgency does not require confusion, and resolution does not benefit from haste that abandons procedure.

Cambodia’s response, therefore, must remain disciplined. Broad denials invite endless rebuttal. Emotional defense erodes procedural authority. Prolonged engagement with peripheral narratives elevates issues that were never central to begin with. Classification, not confrontation, is the appropriate response.

Transnational cybercrime should continue to be addressed through existing regional and international mechanisms. Cambodia has participated in such cooperation and remains open to technical engagement through proper channels. None of these matters alters the legal and diplomatic requirements governing military actions across recognized borders. The purpose of maintaining these distinctions is not abstraction, but civilian protection and regional stability.

The international community understands this separation. It notices who insists on relevance and who benefits from confusion. It understands the difference between platform moderation reports and jurisdictional findings, between crime prevention and territorial legitimacy.

Clarity does not come from multiplying narratives. It comes from holding firm to what is material, verifiable, and consequential. The priority remains unchanged: restraint, de-escalation, and respect for territorial sovereignty, supported by observation and diplomatic process.

Clarity serves peace. Confusion serves escalation. Cambodia will continue to speak where relevance exists, and to remain disciplined where it does not.

Midnight

 

#News

When Categories Replace Facts Why Distinctions Matter in Conflict

0 comment

Like comment

Write a comment......

 One community does not guarantee one destiny!

#News

One community does not guarantee one destiny!

0 comment

Like comment

Write a comment......

 A meaningful message from school children to the brave Cambodian army heroes

#News

A meaningful message from school children to the brave Cambodian army heroes

0 comment

Like comment

Write a comment......

 A meaningful message from school children to the brave Cambodian army heroes

#News

A meaningful message from school children to the brave Cambodian army heroes

0 comment

Like comment

Write a comment......

 To the frontline soldiers! Stay strong, Khmer! From Rattanak

Source: Facebook

#News

To the frontline soldiers! Stay strong, Khmer! From Rattanak

0 comment

Like comment

Write a comment......

In order to uphold the dignity of Cambodia, as well as that of Russia and other foreign nationals who have been accused, I would like to clearly state that Cambodia does not have any Russian nationals or other foreign nationals participating in combat operations on the battlefield or serving as military advisors to the Cambodian armed forces.

#News

In order to uphold the dignity of Cambodia, as well as that of Russia and other foreign nationals who have been accused

0 comment

Like comment

Write a comment......

We acknowledge that there are currently many foreign nationals of various nationalities residing in Cambodia, including tourists, investors, technical experts, and individuals working for foreign or local companies. However, these individuals are not involved in military affairs or combat operations.

#News

We acknowledge that there are currently many foreign nationals of various nationalities residing in Cambodia

0 comment

Like comment

Write a comment......

On December 16, 2025, the Thai army continued firing 155mm artillery shells into Cambodian civilian areas, causing severe damage to civilian homes in Teuk Kraham Village, Teuk Kraham Commune, Choam Khsant District, Preah Vihear Province, at a distance of about 20 kilometers from the border.

#News

On December 16, 2025, the Thai army continued firing 155mm artillery shells into Cambodian civilian areas

0 comment

Like comment

Write a comment......

We have not had foreign troops on Cambodian soil since UNTAC withdrew from Cambodia in 1993. We acknowledge that in the past, foreign military forces have entered Cambodia to conduct multinational or bilateral joint military exercises on Cambodian territory, particularly foreign naval forces arriving through the seaport of Preah Sihanouk Province. This is a normal practice that many other countries have also undertaken within the framework of defense cooperation.

#News

We have not had foreign troops on Cambodian soil since UNTAC withdrew from Cambodia in 1993

0 comment

Like comment

Write a comment......

 Day 10 of the Thai military invasion of Cambodia! Cambodia's brave soldiers and police heroes have continued to stand strong, brave, and fiercely fighting the invading enemy on all battlefields to protect the territorial integrity and people of Cambodia at all costs.

#News

Day 10 of the Thai military invasion of Cambodia Cambodia is brave soldiers and police heroes have continued to stand strong

0 comment

Like comment

Write a comment......

  Dear Mr President Donald J. Trump I really thanks many thanks to you for what you have done Yesterday for my Country 

#News

Dear Mr President Donald J. Trump I really thanks many thanks to you for what you have done Yesterday for my Country

0 comment

Like comment

Write a comment......

-You crawled, walked and ran forward while nearly half a million civilians fled and ran behind.
-Your courage is a shield for the Cambodian nation and the Khmer people.
-You sacrificed to protect our poor homeland, our ancestral land, our history and our future.
-You have continued to fight so that Cambodia can continue to have a tomorrow.
And so, the entire Cambodian nation thanks you, is grateful to you and is indebted to you…

#News

You crawled, walked and ran forward while nearly half a million civilians fled and ran behind.

0 comment

Like comment

Write a comment......

When Maps Become Weapons: Why Thailand's 1:50,000 Border Claims Has No International Legal Effect

In Southeast Asia, borders are not merely lines on maps. They are legacies of colonial rule, postcolonial state-building, and the fragile promise that law, not force, will govern relations between neighbors. Nowhere is this more evident than along the Cambodia–Thailand frontier, where Thailand’s continued reliance on unilateral 1:50,000 scale maps threatens not only bilateral relations but the integrity of the international legal order itself.

The violence that began in May 2025 was initiated by Thailand, not the result of a mutual border skirmish. Cambodian forces did not respond militarily. What followed was a sustained escalation by Thailand that expanded beyond May and continued into December 2025, driven by its attempt to enforce unilateral territorial claims. At the heart of this crisis lies a simple but consequential question: which maps have legal authority?

Read more : https://traju.org/.../when-maps-become-weapons-why.../

Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1ayotX8upQ/?mibextid=wwXIfr

#News

When Maps Become Weapons Why Thailand is 150000 Border Claims Has No International Legal Effect

0 comment

Like comment

Write a comment......

Painting by His Excellency Dr. Hangchuon Naron, Deputy Prime Minister, Minister of Education, Youth and Sports. Painting by Professor Hang Chuon Naron, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Education, Youth and Sports, at a time when more than 1,000 schools were closed, nearly 250,000 students were unable to study due to the invasion of Siamese soldiers.

#News

Painting by His Excellency Dr. Hangchuon Naron, Deputy Prime Minister, Minister of Education, Youth and Sports

0 comment

Like comment

Write a comment......

Thailand is carrying several forms of pressure at the same time, and the last 48 hours show how each layer is pushing the system harder. On the ground, the conflict has expanded. Thai authorities reported that BM-21 rockets landed inside Surin province, including near a district hospital, forcing staff and patients to evacuate into underground shelters. Thai media meanwhile confirmed that F-16s carried out strikes on a Cambodian military position across from Sa Kaeo on the morning of December 10. These reports show a wider combat zone emerging, with Thailand presenting its actions as defensive but still engaging in significant offensive operations.

The public mood reflects this tension. Thai PBS Verify had to debunk widely shared misinformation, including a supposed bomber image that actually came from a WWII video game. When unverified content spreads that fast, it usually means people are anxious and searching for explanations. It also forces newsrooms and officials to react to rumours rather than set the narrative themselves.

Diplomatically, Thailand is taking a firm line. The Defence Ministry described its actions as lawful self-defence and accused Cambodia of taking advantage of Thailand’s flood crisis. At the same time, the foreign minister told Reuters that trade pressure should not be used to push Thailand back into negotiations, saying any ceasefire proposal must be reviewed by the Thai military first. This shows a government trying to protect its negotiating position and avoid looking as though it is being forced into talks.

Inside Thailand’s own politics, not everyone agrees with the government’s approach. Opposition leader Nattaphong Ruangpanyawut said the conflict cannot be solved by military action alone and emphasised that Thailand should follow global principles, proportionality, and diplomacy to avoid being seen internationally as the aggressor. When opposition figures speak this way during a conflict, it signals that unity inside the country is not as solid as the government would prefer.

The economic situation adds another layer of difficulty. Thailand is still dealing with massive flood damage in the south, with government figures indicating more than 500 billion baht in losses and nearly three million people affected. At the same time, Reuters reports that the country has recorded eight straight months of negative headline inflation, and analysts are beginning to point out the policy pressures this creates. These conditions limit how much strain the government can absorb before public confidence becomes harder to maintain.

Putting all of this together, Thailand is managing a widening border conflict, a stressed information environment, a firm but increasingly scrutinised diplomatic stance, visible internal political disagreement, and a challenging economic background. Reuters has already noted that rising casualties and displacement could affect political stability if the conflict continues to expand. This combination of military, social, diplomatic, and economic pressures explains why Thailand appears tense and reactive at this moment.

Midnight

 

#News

Thailand is carrying several forms of pressure at the same time, and the last 48 hours show how each layer is pushing the system harder.

0 comment

Like comment

Write a comment......

Trump’s “peace brand” is now directly tied to this, which changes US behaviour

Multiple outlets are now framing this as a test of Trump’s peace-deal image:

Reuters explains how the fighting “derailed a fragile ceasefire brokered by U.S. President Donald Trump” and later notes the tariff pressure link.

The Guardian and others report Trump publicly promising to “make a call” to stop the fighting, tying his personal brand to the Kuala Lumpur Accord.

AP has already run a piece about two Trump peace deals at risk Congo/Rwanda and Cambodia/Thailand questioning the durability of his agreements.

This means, inside Washington, this conflict is not just a regional border issue. It is now a domestic political metric: does Trump’s “I can fix wars” narrative hold or crack? That makes US diplomats, trade officials, and defence planners treat every Thai move as data about Thailand’s reliability, not just about the border.

Midnight

 

#News

Trump’s “peace brand” is now directly tied to this, which changes US behaviour Multiple outlets are now framing this as a test of Trump’s peace-deal image:

0 comment

Like comment

Write a comment......

Khaosod English has published an opinion piece complaining that Western outlets used the line “Thailand launched air strikes” without clearly emphasizing that clashes had begun earlier. The article argues that this wording could mislead foreign audiences into thinking Thailand initiated the escalation.

This reveals several internal dynamics already forming inside Thailand’s information approach. A domestic talking point is being shaped to protect the country’s image abroad, especially at a time when foreign media are highlighting airstrikes and civilian displacement. Thai newsrooms are being encouraged, directly or indirectly, to push back against international wording and to pressure global outlets to adjust or soften their framing. By making this complaint early, Thai media also lay the groundwork for a future narrative that Western reporting was unfair or incomplete.

What this shows is that the information war is no longer limited to claims from the battlefield. It has moved into the realm of headline language, sequence framing, and how foreign readers understand who escalated and when. Control over that narrative is becoming just as important as events on the ground.

Midnight

 

#News

Khaosod English has published an opinion piece complaining that Western outlets used the line “Thailand launched air strikes

0 comment

Like comment

Write a comment......

Reuters has quietly shifted the frame to a humanitarian crisis, not a military dispute

The article released an hour ago, is not really about who fired first.

It is about families, shelters, bunkers, looting fears, refugee flight, second displacement, and civilians calling for revenge.

In the humanitarian space,the legal and diplomatic reading becomes:

• protection of civilians

• proportionality

• displacement impact

• conflict spillover

This is the first step toward turning a border clash into an international concern.

Reuters references to “hundreds of thousands displaced” is incredibly damaging for Thailand

This line is devastating in global perception:

Hundreds of thousands have moved to temporary shelters.

If that number becomes the dominant figure in reporting, Thailand becomes associated with:

• large-scale civilian flight

• border insecurity

• escalation beyond control

• inability to protect its own population

It shifts the burden of justification onto Thailand even if Reuters does not say it explicitly.

Reuters chose to highlight a Thai villager calling for Cambodia’s military to be “blown to oblivion.”

Reuters is demonstrating that Thai public anger is volatile and militarised, which signals:

• rising domestic pressure on the Thai government

• a public that may push for disproportionate responses

• an unstable political mood inside Thailand

International audiences see this as a warning sign.

Reuters positions the Trump-brokered ceasefire as the “broken promise”

They mention the U.S.-brokered truce TWICE.

They quote Cambodian civilians who believed the Trump agreement would keep the peace.

This quietly frames the renewed escalation as:

• a failure of Thailand to honour a U.S. peace mechanism

• a breakdown that reflects badly on Thailand’s reliability

• a breach with consequences for U.S.–Thailand relations

This is how Reuters builds diplomatic pressure without saying it outright.

Reuters also centres Cambodian civilian suffering more than Thai suffering

Look at the emotional weight:

Thai side:

• fear of looting

• bunkers

• anger

• worries about 130 km weapons

Cambodian side:

• fleeing twice

• losing homes

• grabbing rice to survive

• feeding children with fish caught in ponds

• shock and betrayal that Thailand “attacked again”

This is not accidental. It creates moral asymmetry: one side looks angry and militarised, the other looks vulnerable and displaced. That is how global sympathy is formed.

In this piece, The location details (Ta Krabey, Kaun Kriel) reinforce that this is a contested temple zone

By naming culturally charged sites, Reuters is:

• reminding audiences this is a long-running heritage-linked dispute

• preparing the ground for UNESCO or cultural-protection angles

• signalling that historical grievances are involved

This opens the door for future reporting on temple integrity, cultural violations, and protected-site risks.

Here is the RedFlag: This line is VERY easy to miss:

“Didn't know about that Armenia and Azerbaijan… and I hate to say this…”

Reuters is subtly comparing the Thailand–Cambodia conflict to Nagorno-Karabakh —

a conflict defined by:

• failed ceasefires

• disputed borders

• repeated rounds of escalation

• international concern

• cultural heritage destruction

That comparison is not neutral. It signals to global analysts that this border war resembles another frozen conflict with periodic explosions.

The emotional core of the piece is distrust of Thailand

Two powerful Cambodian quotes:

• “I never expected Thailand to attack Cambodia again.”

• “I didn’t think they would fight again after the U.S. peace agreement.”

This frames Thailand as the “repeat aggressor” in the eyes of civilians, even though Reuters does not state this as fact. International readers absorb emotion before law. Reuters knows this.

Here is The biggest thing we are not seeing:

Reuters is building the long-term narrative baseline

This piece is not about today. It is building the archive that later articles, think-tanks, and foreign ministries will cite. The baseline they are constructing is:

• massive displacement

• frightened families

• broken ceasefire

• civilians blaming Thailand

• Cambodian villagers fleeing twice

• Thai civilians calling for obliteration

• U.S. involvement

• border instability becoming regional instability

This is how narrative foundations are laid.

Once Reuters publishes this, every future article will echo its structure.

Midnight 

#News

Reuters has quietly shifted the frame to a humanitarian crisis, not a military dispute The article released an hour ago, is not really about who fired first.

0 comment

Like comment

Write a comment......